No matter what option you choose, good shots go in. While it’s true to some degree, it’s not the only factor. They’ve assumed that this is because his opponent knows the releases and all there is to it is getting an excellent release and the shots go in. One of the other reasons that guys gravitate to that option is because they have played guys in quick match and have been torched. Guys that stake their claim to sim basketball often feel it’s more sim to use real player percentage because of that. Because they named one shooting type by putting the word “real” in it, it gives the impression that it will provide more realistic shooting percentages and therefore must be better and even more challenging. The first problem I see with these two choices is how they are named. The difficulty, sliders used, the defense, shot selection and who is guarding you all come into play. The other things are still important and still effect the shot. Each player’s unique release point is no longer a factor, it’s up to the percentages. You just shoot, release and not worry about timing. Because of that you can shoot the same with each player. What this does is remove shooting releases from the equation. The other option is real player percentage. How likely that is will depend on the difficulty level and sliders you are using and whether it was a good shot, who was guarding you, whether your player has the ability to hit shots from there, the game situation and the defensive scheme employed at the time. Those can go in even if not perfectly timed. It also doesn’t mean that a shot release that wasn’t excellent won’t go in either. But even if you do get an excellent release, it doesn’t mean that it’s guaranteed to go in. You goal is to get an excellent release on every shot you take. These players have all participated in the three point contest before and Buddy Hield and Eric Gordon even won the contest themselves.Each release can either be very early, early, excellent, late or very late. He also has a higher three point rating than players like Kyrie, Dame, Buddy Hield, CJ McCollum, Mike Conley, Eric Gordon, and Seth Curry. He shouldn't be in the same conversation as these players when it comes to shooting threes. Not all generational talents are elite shooters from deep. Luka is one of my favorite players but I honestly don't think his 3 pt rating should be that high. Karl-Anthony Towns 86 3pt rating, 2022 3pt contest winner.Trae Young: 86 3pt rating, 2019 3 pt contest participant, 2022 3pt contest finalist.Jayson Tatum: 86 3pt rating, 2021 3pt contest participant. Joe Harris: 87 3pt rating, 2019 3pt contest winner.Devin Booker: 87 3pt rating, 2018 3pt contest winner, 2020 3pt contest finalist.Luka Doncic: 87 3pt rating, career 33.7% from three.Desmond Bane: 88 3pt rating, 2022 3pt contest participant.Luke Kennard: 88 3pt rating, 2022 3pt contest finalist.Klay Thompson: 88 3pt rating, 2016 3pt contest winner.Kevin Durant: 88 3pt rating, 50-40-90 club member, 2012 3 pt contest runner-up.Steph Curry: 99 3pt rating, Greatest shooter in NBA History, 50-40-90 club member, 2-time 3pt contest winner.To put things into context, here's a list of the top 3 point shooters in the game. Not to mention that his catch-and-shoot 3 point percentage has never been the greatest. Luka's an amazing player but he's a career 33.7% three point shooter and he only shot 35.3% on threes last year.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |